The sync service that got there first and is now the expensive option. It still syncs better than most; the price per terabyte is the argument.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 60% would buy it again, which means roughly 40% would not. Competitors bundle the same storage inside cheaper suites.
Reliability keeps delivering while the value comparison keeps worsening. Most people leave over price rather than problems.
Competitors bundle the same storage inside cheaper suites. Plan changes have removed storage some long-term customers relied on. The price gap widens each year.
Worth it for: People who need sync to be flawless; Collaborators sharing large files often; Anyone burned by a less reliable service. Think twice if: You mainly need cheap bulk storage; You already pay for a suite that includes storage; You rarely sync between machines.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.6 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.0 / 10 |
| One month | 7.3 / 10 |
| Six months | 6.9 / 10 |
| One year | 6.7 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.7 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Coverage of the withdrawal of the unlimited plan.
Customer thread about storage allowances being reduced.
Comparative review against current rivals.