A flexible workspace that becomes whatever you build in it, which is both the appeal and the problem. Performance and offline access are the long-running complaints.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 73% would buy it again, which means roughly 27% would not. Performance on big workspaces is the top recurring complaint.
The honeymoon of building the perfect system ends and the performance of a large workspace becomes the daily experience.
Performance on big workspaces is the top recurring complaint. Time spent building systems instead of using them. Leaving with complex content intact is genuinely hard.
Worth it for: Small teams needing shared documentation; People who enjoy building their own systems; Anyone replacing several separate tools. Think twice if: You work offline frequently; You want something fast and opinionated; You would tinker instead of working.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.8 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 7.8 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.4 / 10 |
| One year | 7.3 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 7.3 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Collects the recurring user complaints.
Verified business-user reviews over extended use.
Assesses the state of offline support.