A good-sounding smart speaker whose assistant has measurably regressed — a point Google itself has acknowledged while promising improvements.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 47% would buy it again, which means roughly 53% would not. Functionality regressing after purchase is the defining complaint.
The hardware is unchanged and the service is worse. This is the same failure mode as the Echo Show — the device you own diverges from the one you bought.
Functionality regressing after purchase is the defining complaint. Owner threads document commands that stopped working. Coverage suggests legal action over the failures.
Worth it for: Music playback in a second room; People already using Google's ecosystem; Anyone buying at a heavy discount. Think twice if: You depend on voice control working reliably; You are building a smart home around it; You would be frustrated by regressions.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.6 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.1 / 10 |
| One month | 7.2 / 10 |
| Six months | 6.3 / 10 |
| One year | 5.9 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 5.8 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Google acknowledging functional regressions in its own platform.
The company's public apology and commitments.
Owner thread on the manufacturer's own forum documenting failures.