A very fast drive that shipped with firmware causing rapid health degradation. Samsung issued a fix that stops further loss but does not restore what was already lost.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 70% would buy it again, which means roughly 30% would not. Owners who updated late were left with permanently reduced reported health.
A genuine dip and partial recovery: the firmware fix restored confidence for most owners without undoing the reported health loss.
Owners who updated late were left with permanently reduced reported health. The issue affected a storage product, where trust matters most. Health monitoring became a habit for affected owners.
Worth it for: People buying current stock with the fixed firmware; High-throughput workloads needing the speed; Anyone who will keep firmware updated. Think twice if: You are buying old stock without checking firmware; You want the cheapest reliable drive; You would not run the manufacturer's software.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.1 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.5 / 10 |
| One month | 6.8 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.1 / 10 |
| One year | 7.2 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 7.3 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Coverage of the fix issued for the health degradation problem.
Explains that the fix stops but does not reverse the degradation.
Documents the company's response and replacement process.