A fast processor from a generation with a documented degradation problem. Chips that worked for months began crashing, and the RMA experience became its own story.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
The pattern in the sources is regret. Only 29% of owners say they would buy it again, and satisfaction falls from 8.6 to 4.6 out of 10 by the two-year mark.
This is the rare case where the decline is literal — the silicon degraded, and owners watched stable machines become unstable.
Degradation over time was the defining failure — chips got worse, not just faulty. Community documentation of the problem outpaced the manufacturer's response. Owners describe lengthy RMA processes.
It is a real product that works, but its launch reception (74 out of 100 for hype) ran well ahead of how owners feel about it later. Degradation over time was the defining failure — chips got worse, not just faulty. That gap is what the regret score measures.
Worth it for: Nobody buying new today without checking the fix status; Production workloads where the platform is already in place; Owners with confirmed post-fix chips. Think twice if: You want hardware that behaves the same in year two; You would find an RMA process unacceptable; A competing platform would do the same work.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.0 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.6 / 10 |
| One month | 7.2 / 10 |
| Six months | 5.4 / 10 |
| One year | 4.8 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 4.6 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Technical community thread that documented the instability in detail.
Coverage of replacement and refund outcomes for affected owners.
Reports on RMA denials during the early stage of the issue.
Practical guidance that existed because the problem was widespread.