Petlibro's Granary is a 5-litre Wi-Fi automatic pet feeder with a stainless steel bowl, app scheduling, portions as small as 1/12 cup and D-battery backup, also sold with a 1080p night-vision camera. Owners like the remote scheduling and camera peace of mind, but jams with some kibble, uneven portions and inconsistent unit reliability recur.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 68% would buy it again, which means roughly 32% would not. Some units fail within weeks or months.
Owners whose unit keeps working tend to rely on it heavily for travel and portion control, and the camera remains a highlight. The regret comes from jams, uneven portions and a minority of units that stop working within months.
Some units fail within weeks or months. Desiccant bags need regular replacement or the app throws errors. Replacement parts can be hard to get.
Worth it for: Multi-cat households with different diets; Owners who travel for weekends; Pets on weight-control plans. Think twice if: Pets fed very small kibble; Owners wanting google home integration; Anyone unwilling to pay for cloud video.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.2 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.0 / 10 |
| One month | 7.6 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.1 / 10 |
| One year | 6.9 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.6 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
A month with the Granary camera feeder found tiny portions, the camera and the meal-call audio genuinely useful for a two-cat home, with cloud recording costs and non-included backup batteries as downsides.
Mostly positive owners value the camera, two-way audio and scheduling, but some report occasional jams, portions heavier than the app states and no Google Home support.
Owners of the non-camera Wi-Fi model like easy setup and remote feeding, while noting coarse portion steps, Wi-Fi range limits and one unit that broke after about six months.
A 4.0-star average from 170 ratings: owners praise scheduling, the camera and easy cleaning, but report jams with small kibble, uneven bowl splitting, error codes and some units failing within a month.