A camera that tosses treats and barks alerts to your phone. The hardware is pleasant; nearly every feature people actually want is behind a subscription, and that is where the complaints live.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 49% would buy it again, which means roughly 51% would not. Subscription pressure is the dominant theme in reviews.
The camera keeps working while the subscription question keeps being asked, and the answer for most owners is no.
Subscription pressure is the dominant theme in reviews. Service and refund experiences generate sustained complaints. Free functionality has narrowed over time.
Worth it for: People leaving an anxious dog alone regularly; Households who will pay the subscription; Anyone wanting interaction rather than just video. Think twice if: You want a camera without ongoing costs; A general indoor camera would do; You would find support problems unacceptable.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.0 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 7.0 / 10 |
| Six months | 6.4 / 10 |
| One year | 6.2 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.1 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Customer reviews concentrating on subscription and support experiences.
Expert review of features and what the subscription unlocks.
Three-year owner account of continued use.