Laser-measured floor liners that cost several times a generic mat and last the life of the car. Owners argue about the price and keep buying them for the next car.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
On the evidence gathered here, yes. 85% of owners say they would buy it again, and satisfaction is still 8.3 out of 10 two years in. Owners report liners outlasting the car.
Steady. The complaints that survive are about price and appearance, never about whether they work.
Rivals have closed the gap at lower prices. Surface scuffs visibly over years. Fit on some less common models is looser than advertised.
Owners report liners outlasting the car. Sentiment across the ownership period stays close to flat, which is rare: it reads 8.4 out of 10 in the first week and 8.3 two years later.
Worth it for: Wet or snowy climates; Work vehicles and dog owners; Anyone protecting a lease return. Think twice if: You keep cars a year or two; A generic mat handles your conditions; You dislike the rigid plastic look.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.8 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 8.3 / 10 |
| Six months | 8.3 / 10 |
| One year | 8.3 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 8.3 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Tested review of fit and durability.
Owner thread on long-term fit and wear.
Direct comparison against a cheaper competitor.