The first smart glasses people actually wear in public, and reviewers keep using the phrase old complaints. Two generations in, the same limitations are still the limitations.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 63% would buy it again, which means roughly 37% would not. Charging case dependence becomes a daily chore.
Either they became your glasses or they became a charging case in a drawer. The split is roughly even and it happens early.
Charging case dependence becomes a daily chore. Novelty of the camera fades for most owners. Hardware tied to one company's platform and account.
Worth it for: Hands-free photos and video while active; People who already wear Ray-Bans; Podcast and call listening outdoors. Think twice if: You want all-day battery; Privacy-sensitive settings and workplaces; You expect a display or AR.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.5 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.6 / 10 |
| One month | 7.6 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.1 / 10 |
| One year | 6.9 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.9 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Review noting which complaints persisted across generations.
Review of capability and limitations.
Generational comparison review.
Specification reporting on the second generation.