A beautifully marketed pan that replaced several others on the hob. Coating longevity is the recurring complaint, and the newer titanium version has drawn legal scrutiny over its claims.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 53% would buy it again, which means roughly 47% would not. Food starts sticking sooner than owners expect.
The coating is the whole story. Around this point owners start reporting food catching, and the pan moves from favourite to backup.
Food starts sticking sooner than owners expect. A law firm opened an investigation into the titanium version's claims. Treated as a consumable rather than an heirloom pan.
Worth it for: Small kitchens replacing several pans; Low and medium heat everyday cooking; People who will hand-wash and use wooden utensils. Think twice if: You sear steaks at high heat; You want a pan for decades; You put everything in the dishwasher.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.0 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.6 / 10 |
| One month | 7.4 / 10 |
| Six months | 6.6 / 10 |
| One year | 6.3 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.3 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Cook's review of daily performance and where the coating struggles.
Twelve-month account of how the surface performs over time.
Law firm investigation into the coating claims made for the newer model.