Bought almost entirely for its response time, and it delivers that. Where owners get frustrated is expecting cinema contrast from a bright, fast, lamp-based gaming projector.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 71% would buy it again, which means roughly 29% would not. Lamp dimming is gradual and easy to miss until it is bad.
The gaming case still holds. The nagging is the lamp hour counter and the black levels in anything watched at night.
Lamp dimming is gradual and easy to miss until it is bad. Colour wheel noise develops in some units. Owners sensitive to rainbows never stop noticing them.
Worth it for: Console gaming on a big screen; Rooms with some ambient light; People who accept lamp replacement. Think twice if: You see DLP rainbow artefacts; Dark-room film purists; You want zero maintenance.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.9 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.3 / 10 |
| One month | 7.6 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.3 / 10 |
| One year | 7.2 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 7.2 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Measured input lag, brightness and contrast.
Specialist review of gaming performance and picture.
Owner reviews including lamp and noise reports.
Aggregated owner discussion of the UHD/UHZ35 family.