Lenovo's 14.5-inch Copilot+ laptop with a 2944x1840 90Hz OLED touchscreen, a 12-core Snapdragon X Elite chip and a 70Wh battery in a 1.28kg aluminium body. Owners rave about its battery life, screen and speed, but Windows-on-Arm app gaps, USB-C-only ports and thin long-term evidence keep it from a clean sweep.
This entry is written from the 5 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
On the evidence gathered here, yes. 80% of owners say they would buy it again, and satisfaction is still 7.5 out of 10 two years in. Battery life still impresses owners months in.
Owners past the first few months mostly still praise the battery, screen and speed. Where regret shows up it is usually a must-have app or printer driver that won't run on Arm, plus isolated hardware faults such as a failed trackpad.
An isolated report of a trackpad failure just past the warranty. An owner reports occasional random screen blackouts. Developer and niche tools often still need x86 workarounds.
Battery life still impresses owners months in. Sentiment across the ownership period stays close to flat, which is rare: it reads 8.4 out of 10 in the first week and 7.5 two years later.
Worth it for: Students and office workers; Travellers who need all-day battery; Media watching on an oled screen. Think twice if: Pc gamers; Users of niche or legacy windows software; People who rely on usb-a or wired headphones.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.6 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 8.1 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.9 / 10 |
| One year | 7.7 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 7.5 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Praises the OLED screen, roughly 16-hour video battery result and cheap RAM/storage upgrades, but flags USB-C-only ports, imperfect Arm app compatibility and weak gaming.
Lab testing found class-leading video battery life, a bright OLED and strong multi-core speed, offset by weak graphics, a reflective screen, thin speakers and some non-native Arm software.
A developer's hands-on account praises the rigid build, OLED, quiet running and battery, but documents many tools lacking native Arm builds, no headphone jack and early Linux trouble.
Mostly five-star owner reviews, a few from near the one-year mark, praising speed, battery and screen; complaints cover incompatible apps, old printer drivers, limited ports and one report of screen blackouts.
Largely positive, often incentivised reviews about performance and battery, with one six-month owner reporting a broken trackpad and a frustrating out-of-warranty support experience.