The robot vacuum that promised to avoid pet mess and mostly does. Owners like it; the reservations are about price, noise and the ongoing cost of bags and brushes.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 63% would buy it again, which means roughly 37% would not. Consumables add up into a real annual cost.
The novelty of a self-emptying robot fades and the maintenance routine becomes visible — bags, brushes and the occasional rescue.
Consumables add up into a real annual cost. Brushes and wheels need cleaning to maintain performance. Battery and side brushes wear over a couple of years.
Worth it for: Homes with pets and hard floors; People who want maintenance cleaning rather than deep cleaning; Anyone who'll tidy cables before a run. Think twice if: You have deep carpets; You want to replace your vacuum entirely; Recurring consumable costs annoy you.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.4 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 7.7 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.1 / 10 |
| One year | 6.9 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.9 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Testing-led review of obstacle avoidance and cleaning performance.
Review framing it as maintenance cleaning rather than a vacuum replacement.
Owner thread weighing the price against real household usefulness.