A responsive bassinet that many parents credit with real sleep. Then the company added a subscription for features existing owners already had, which is what made the news.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 62% would buy it again, which means roughly 38% would not. Adding a subscription after purchase was widely criticised.
The baby outgrows it, which was always the plan. The sentiment damage came from the subscription change rather than the product.
Adding a subscription after purchase was widely criticised. Useful life is measured in months, not years. Babies who refuse it make it an expensive ornament.
Worth it for: First-time parents prioritising sleep; Families planning more than one child; Anyone who will rent rather than buy. Think twice if: You would be angry about post-purchase paywalls; Space is tight; You are near the end of the newborn stage.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.8 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.8 / 10 |
| One month | 8.2 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.4 / 10 |
| One year | 7.1 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 7.0 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Coverage of the subscription added after purchase and the reaction.
Detailed cost and effectiveness analysis over a trial period.
Compares renting against buying for the short useful window.