A capable replacement for the Chromecast that reviewers keep describing as fine but expensive. The long-term risk on any Google device of this class is the company losing interest in it.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 64% would buy it again, which means roughly 36% would not. Owners worry about how long Google supports it.
Performance holds. The questions that grow are how long Google keeps it updated and how much of the home screen is being sold.
Owners worry about how long Google supports it. Home screen promotion has increased since launch. Storage and RAM will date faster than the Shield's did.
Worth it for: Google Home households needing a hub; Chromecast owners upgrading; People who use Google TV recommendations. Think twice if: You want guaranteed years of support; You already have a streaming device that works; Ad-free home screens matter to you.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.8 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.1 / 10 |
| One month | 7.3 / 10 |
| Six months | 6.9 / 10 |
| One year | 6.8 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.8 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Long-term review weighing price against performance.
Post-honeymoon review of daily use.
Owner reviews covering setup and hub features.
Independent owner review listing.