A cordless vacuum good enough to replace a corded one, with a battery that is the clock on the whole machine.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 72% would buy it again, which means roughly 28% would not. Owner threads report batteries failing at around three years.
Performance holds; run time is what owners start planning around, and the battery becomes the conversation somewhere around year three.
Owner threads report batteries failing at around three years. Replacement batteries are expensive relative to the machine. Brush bar tangles need periodic clearing.
Worth it for: Homes with pets and hard floors; People who vacuum little and often; Anyone who hates dragging a cord. Think twice if: You clean a large house in one long session; You want the cheapest capable vacuum; Battery replacement cost would annoy you.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.9 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.5 / 10 |
| One month | 8.1 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.7 / 10 |
| One year | 7.5 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 7.5 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Owner thread on the manufacturer's forum about battery decline.
Owner report of battery failure outside warranty.
Repair-community thread on diagnosing and replacing the battery.