A gimbal camera small enough to actually carry, which is why it gets used. Long-term reviews at one year and fifteen months reach the same conclusion as the launch ones.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
On the evidence gathered here, yes. 90% of owners say they would buy it again, and satisfaction is still 8.8 out of 10 two years in. One-year and fifteen-month reviews still rate it the best in its class.
It keeps getting carried, which is the whole test for a camera this size. Long-term reviewers land in the same place as launch reviewers.
The gimbal remains the part to worry about in a bag. Spare batteries and a case become necessary purchases. Internal storage and heat limit very long sessions.
One-year and fifteen-month reviews still rate it the best in its class. Sentiment across the ownership period stays close to flat, which is rare: it reads 8.7 out of 10 in the first week and 8.8 two years later.
Worth it for: Travel and vlogging where a big camera stays home; Anyone filming themselves; People who value stabilisation above all. Think twice if: You need a rugged or waterproof camera; You shoot long-form on a tripod; You already carry a stabilised mirrorless setup.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.4 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.7 / 10 |
| One month | 8.8 / 10 |
| Six months | 8.8 / 10 |
| One year | 8.8 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 8.8 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Long-term review assessing whether it stayed in use after the novelty.
Working creator's account of where it replaced larger cameras and where it did not.
Twelve-month revisit on durability and continued use.
Photographer's extended-use review covering handling and image quality.