The mattress that created the bed-in-a-box category. Comfortable at first, with sagging complaints that recur often enough to define the long-term picture.
This entry is written from the 3 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 54% would buy it again, which means roughly 46% would not. Impressions in the sleeping area are the dominant complaint.
Comfort at delivery was never the issue. Support is what changes, and that is where the complaints concentrate.
Impressions in the sleeping area are the dominant complaint. Warranty requires a measured sag depth that takes time to reach. Owners commonly replace sooner than expected.
Worth it for: Guest rooms and lighter use; People who want easy delivery and returns; Couples sensitive to movement. Think twice if: You are heavier and need lasting support; You expect a decade from a mattress; You sleep hot.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.8 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 7.5 / 10 |
| Six months | 6.7 / 10 |
| One year | 6.4 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.3 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Collects the recurring complaints including sagging.
Owner complaint analysis over longer ownership.
Tested review of support and materials.