Does far more than a reMarkable because it runs Android, and the release cadence is fast enough that reviewers openly ask whether each new model was needed. Obsolescence, not hardware failure, is the long-term risk.
This entry is written from the 4 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
It depends on how you will use it. 61% would buy it again, which means roughly 39% would not. One-year-later reviews focus on obsolescence and update quality.
The device is capable and the newer one is already out. Owner reviews a year in are mostly about that, not about faults.
One-year-later reviews focus on obsolescence and update quality. Firmware releases have broken working features. Resale value falls quickly because of the release cadence.
Worth it for: Reading and annotating across many apps; People who want colour e-ink; Anyone who refuses a subscription device. Think twice if: You want polished, stable software; You would be annoyed by a newer model next quarter; You only need handwriting and nothing else.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 8.2 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.3 / 10 |
| One month | 7.4 / 10 |
| Six months | 7.0 / 10 |
| One year | 6.8 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 6.8 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
One-year assessment focused on obsolescence and updates.
Owner thread on firmware-introduced problems.
Analysis of the release cadence.
Customer reviews covering support and hardware.