A remarkably roomy ultralight tent. The trade-off is right there in the name: thin fabrics and fine zips, treated gently, for years of good nights.
This entry is written from the 2 sources listed at the bottom of the page. The numbers are our editorial estimates drawn from that material, not measurements, and no statistical sample sits behind them.
On the evidence gathered here, yes. 81% of owners say they would buy it again, and satisfaction is still 8.1 out of 10 two years in. Owners report many seasons with careful use.
Steady, if you treat it as the ultralight item it is. The complaints that appear are zips and small tears, not design failures.
Zip failures are the recurring complaint. Floor punctures without a footprint. Fly fabric degrades with heavy UV exposure.
Owners report many seasons with careful use. Sentiment across the ownership period stays close to flat, which is rare: it reads 8.4 out of 10 in the first week and 8.1 two years later.
Worth it for: Backpackers who want space without weight; Three-season use; Couples sharing a tent. Think twice if: You camp in sustained storms; You pitch on rough ground without care; You want a tent to be careless with.
Our reading of how sentiment moves across an ownership period, drawn from the sources below. It is an editorial estimate, not tracked longitudinal data.
| At purchase | 7.7 / 10 |
|---|---|
| First week | 8.4 / 10 |
| One month | 8.3 / 10 |
| Six months | 8.2 / 10 |
| One year | 8.1 / 10 |
| Two years or more | 8.1 / 10 |
Owner reviews move this score. The researched figure stays visible next to it, so you can always see what the sources said before anyone voted.
Leave a review on the live pageEvery complaint and every piece of praise above traces back to these. The summaries are ours; nothing is quoted, and no link, quote or username anywhere on this site is invented.
Detailed review of space, weight and fabric durability.
Hunter and backcountry owner thread on real-world durability.